Self esteem is what drives human confidence and is the basis of human assertiveness, positive mental attitude and productivity within the context of level of consistency of the same. Based on research self esteem is diverse and correlates with various factors within human environment and implications caused by other humans within the environment.

The need to comprehensively understand concepts, variables and implications on human physiological stature is important and profound. It is essential in the context to investigate and score the intricacy levels distinctions so as to offer, understand and advice consistently and profoundly what and how we can improve on our self esteem and how to avert negative physiological implications on the latter.

Sample data analysis, research on models and theories of the subject plus a comprehensive analysis of the data investigating the correlation of self esteem with gratitude, optimism and neuroticism explains the perspective of this investigation and comprehensively as within the objective of the paper gives comprehensive insight and conceptual background about overall resolve on the subject.

The importance of this perspective is the need to identify personal goals based on self evaluation of attitude towards issues that reflect on personal development. They all base the impedance of attitude to self esteem and its variables and factors. The context expansively define and explore how self esteem correlates to the gratitude of recipients, the optimism of the subject and the aspects of neuroticism. Having a clear picturesque about the implications and how to develop a self esteem and maintaining it throughout ones life becomes the principal objective of this research.

Current research and insights about self esteem reflect on using social perspectives and medical remedies to reduce and tone down effects and extents of low self esteem which obviously reflects to stress levels which affect our system through various dangerous ailments like stomach ulcers. This paper seeks to seek a cognitive approach to identifying the causes and factors leading to the inter-relationship between the latter and some other factors.

The principals of investigating this correlation are based on a methodology which identifies respondent’s insights, perspectives and objective views on the latter. Identifying their attitudes towards each variable and the purpose of each factor and implication on their self esteem is part of the broader spectrum of identifying the research problem. Here we identify the respondent’s reactions; self esteem level and future insight on its consistent growth plus how it is to contribute to his well being on the long term. We examine the implications of the demographics on the respondent’s life and life style. We seek to identify what the objective perspective of the respondents correlate with the various discussed contexts. The examination as such gives us a clear picture to satiate our research as a factual finding within scientific parametrical approaches. Through such a solid argument we comprehensively analyse our data and resolve, through establishing facts within the arguments and models that par with our finds and subsequently make comprehensive resolves about the research problem.

The reason why we should espouse this subject and its disciplines is that it directly affects our daily lives. It determines and regulates our performance, emotions and lifestyle while ate the same time controlling our social life directly. Having insights on this hence becomes integral in making life more comprehensive and that our productivity becomes very apt.

 

Correlation research

 

We base our model theories on the research and make the subject (self esteem) implicit. Elementary we find that people with implicit self esteem have a very high association quotient. He is assertive, responsible and self conscious. As such we conclude people with implicit self esteem associate and perform more aptly while those with low esteem associate and perform poorly.

We measure the correlation within the context of neuroticism, gratitude and optimism. This revolves around the parametrical approach based on respondent-research query principle and we make the measure based on response survey.

Most persons who are satisfied with their lives and their lifestyles have very implicit self-esteem within a certain level. This we relate with the self esteem as the optimism factor optimism to life, achievement and to good things in life. The respondents within the survey expanse respond positively towards their view on personal achievements. They highlight their joy in achieving through hard work and witty approach towards life. They are content and focussed to better performance. They have friends and are well connected.

Methodology of this model

Fifty respondents of different social backgrounds and race participated in the survey. Each implicitly responded to the questionnaire about what he feels about his life based on the facts that reflect on his confidence and self esteem.

Dissenting views as seen below reflect to the objective of the survey. The questionnaire is based on the optimism factor and the response is based in the aspects of optimism profundity.

Self esteem correlates positively with satisfaction to life {partial r ¼ 0.29, p < 0.05}

Self esteem correlates positively with gratitude   {partial r ¼ 0.25, p < 0.05}

Self esteem correlates positively with neuroticism {No}

 

Basis of the conclusion and aspects of research methodology

The four major questions that project the over view are as below.

 

1 In most ways my life is close to my ideal {the respondents confer that, ‘however a certain percentage disagree’ they are very content with their optimism about being close to achieving their goals in life}

2 The conditions of my life are excellent {the respondents confirm that they are not very content with their living conditions due to goals and ideologies based on their perspectives about life and what they have projected to be like}

3 I am satisfied with my life. {A huge percentage refuses to accept the fact. They decry economic conditions and project their goals and economic goals as discontent factors}

4 If I could live my life over, I would change almost everything {this question is purported to prove the individual self esteem correlation with optimistic semantic models. The respondents unanimously wish they could re-live their lives and they are sure they would do much better and make their lives very good. Optimism is very proportional to self esteem}

Argument of the correlation

The case of correlation of self esteem with gratitude

The case of gratitude and its effect on life perception by human being is necessitated by virtue of self esteem and the objectivity of human will about life within the essential proximities he lives in. According Seneca {on benefits, 2.22.1} ‘He who receives a benefit with gratitude repays the first installment on his debt. Seneca (On Benefits, 2.22.1) and within the argument of La Rochefoucauld {maxims, 298} in the generality of men is only a strong and secret desire of receiving greater favors. —La Rochefoucauld (Maxims, 298. Gratitude is conceptual; it is indicative of consistency of desire and need to identify with. The needs of desire within a conceptual basis are based on confidence. Desire survives within confidence. Confidence is the surrogate of self esteem and within the same context it is self esteem. This expounds the logic of correlation. It’s the inverse-ness and perpendicularity within a literal aspect, of the two subjects as human traits and characters, whose purpose is to project the finesse and objectiveness of purpose and character. Correlation. Gratitude, defined as an emotional appreciation of and thank­fulness for favors received, has been well established as a universal human at­tribute. Its presence is expressed and felt in different ways by virtually all peoples, of all cultures, in all of society (McCullough, Kirkpatrick, Emmons, & Larson, 2001). Though the phenomenon of gratitude can be evaluated in a wide variety of personal and social contexts, we focus here on gratitude in the context of services rendered and received. Reciprocity—the mutual exchange of favors—encompasses a wide variety of goods and services. The importance of such exchanges in human society is difficult to ignore. “Social equilibrium,” sociologist Alvin Gouldner (1960) wrote, “could not exist without the reciprocity of service and return service” (p. 162). But reciproc­ity is not a uniquely human attribute. “Acts of giving, receiving, and repay­ment permeate nearly every aspect of human life, and seemingly, the lives of many other species”.  (Taylor & McGuire, 1988, p 67) Reciprocal exchanges govern the lives of many social beings, including fish, birds, and mammals. Robert A. Emmons, Michael E. McCullough: The Psychology of Gratitude; Oxford University Press. Place of Publication: New York. 2004. p 213

We refine the argument and espouse the characteristics of the negativity and positivistic features of gratitude within humanistic semantic models describe the statures of human confidence. The negatives within correlate with low esteem while the positive correlate with the high self esteem. Negatives reflect on poor evaluation and poor self value and low objectivity quotients.

Research and argument in the case of self esteem correlation to optimism

Self-esteem is based upon self-efficacy, and high self-esteem correlates with optimism. Optimists with high self-esteem appear to be assertive, more objective and optimistic about their goals. This is indicative of high self esteem. To confirm this, we seek to identify the aspect of the correlation within the context of objective optimism. This research examines expansively that self esteem and optimism have a level of interdependency. A survey carried out within the scope of the research explicates through the findings the connections and variability within the correlation. Respondents answer several questions and out of the major four questions whose weight is our determinant help conclude that optimistic personalities have very high self esteem. This conforms to Rosenberg theory and model evaluation of self esteem. According to Rosenberg Self-esteem is a uni-polar concept that reflects the person’s general experience about his/her personal abilities and evaluation of his/her personal characteristics.

The four questions

–          I feel I am a person of worth, at least on an equal plane with others

–          I take a positive attitude toward myself

–          I feel I have a number of good qualities.

;

–          I am able to do things as well as most people

Respondents showing these traits in their social-economic life have very high esteem while those who answered no have low esteem. {This is based on the Rosenberg model}

As such we conclude that personalities with high self esteem are objective and very optimistic about their bright future and are content with their performance. We further investigate this through the same model what their perspective based on the optimism principle is so as to confirm that they understand optimism as part of objective distinctiveness. We summarize through the same formula of taking the strong points percentage as the conclusive analysis we needed and the negative response as the vice-versa attribute in principal. This is as on the basis of ideological manifestations as argued in However, the self focus in attention has not gained much interest in coping research as a distinct phenomenon, although many assumptions proposed by self attention theory behaviour as almost call for verification in the field of coping well Ralf Schwarzer: Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ.1986. p 87

Basing our finds on previous studies like those of Chang, we find that academically there is a performance quotient whose value is gained on the self esteem angle. According to Chang, optimistic students are better adjusted physically and psychologically than are pessimistic students. This shows that this trend is present throughout life since these students are active social figures and easily relate with other members of the society. This is argued through a contextual perspective in Segerstrom, Taylor, Kemeny, ; Fancy, 1998 model. The conclusion is that by the same token, optimistic people were found to be lower in mood disturbance when they respond to a wide range of stressful situations. This means their confidence is within their weakness, it is the learners variable and cannot be explicit unless subjected to scrutiny and within the perspective defined.

Conclusion

Self esteem correlated to optimism. It is factual and the research and models seen within the academia expanse conform to our finds in principal.

Self-esteem correlated to neuroticism

We examine this possibility through analyzing data from our model which also has a semblance to the Rosenberg model. We examine the neuroticism perspective through the scope of attributes towards personal feelings, character of the humanistic skills and thoroughly looking into character. This is what we examine as the neurotic aspects of neuroticism activity. Question and human character describe the correlation quotient through neuroticism converging to form a higher order factor that is well explained within the context of self-esteem level. Within the Rosenberg ten items scale we chose the most decisive of our findings and discover that, the higher the neuroticism active level the higher the self esteem within the personality. Empirical data support our find based on similarity in the results. The human traits, which we discuss within this context as the humanistic attributes and character of artistic and character nature are what we herein refer as traits all which now we classify as the neurotic aspects. We seek validity of correlation through four empirical statures. One we measure, through our questionnaire based on the Rosenberg ten scales, that, measures of traits are principles of confidence. Persons with good physique, beautiful and well built have a lot of self esteem due to their likeability and that, that likeability is a humanistic feature which has character, and that’s what adds up self esteem. It is a common concept within the consistency of these attributes that matter on the long term. Secondly, we examine how those with high intelligence, academic performance, and other traits of active brain and response towards assertive life aspects portray themselves. He we find out that intelligent people are very confident and focused. It applies commonly within the entire cluster of the positive and assertive traits. Self esteem is much dynamic and high within these traits. Within the traits response towards intrinsic implication, we seek to identify the correlation based on perspective towards what the perspective of the nature and environment impose on the persons. The self esteem correlated to neuroticism more positively within this context. We base our findings on strong points derivates of the Rosenberg scale best questions. We conclude that these traits operate similarly; they are conceptually related in that the positivistic of self description operationalize both neuroticism and self esteem.

;